
2025年9月24日,北京中銀(深圳)律師事務所權益合伙人譚岳奇律師受邀出席中國仲裁周活動“數字經濟時代國際仲裁的創新與發展研討會”,發表“中國商事仲裁國際化的幾點規則思考”主題演講,為促進中國仲裁制度的完善與國際接軌提出了富有建設性的思路。
On September 24, 2025, Mr. Tan Yueqi(Vincent), Equity Partner of Beijng Zhongyin(Shenzhen) Law Firm, was invited to attend the China Arbitration Week event—the Seminar on Innovation and Development of International Arbitration in the Digital Economy Era. He delivered an in-depth speech entitled “Reflections on the Rules for the Internationalization of Commercial Arbitration in China”, providing constructive ideas to promote the refinement and international alignment of China’s arbitration system.
在臨時措施、財產保全與緊急仲裁程序領域,通過將三者對比,譚律師指出臨時措施和緊急仲裁程序屬于內生于普通法系的制度,中國仲裁界在吸收和借鑒時應當關注該兩種制度的獨特性。對于法律適用規則,譚律師指出,目前中國仲裁制度中所引“當事人沒有約定實體準據法時,適用仲裁庭認為合適的法律”是一個重要的發展趨勢,這里注意仲裁庭在適用實體法時與我國《涉外民事法律關系適用法》的潛在沖突,并尤其要關注強行法的適用。就外國法適用與專家證人制度,他提出應引入中立專家證人。圍繞仲裁地法概念,明確仲裁地法的核心屬性是 “支配和決定仲裁程序的法律”,不同于仲裁開庭地的法律;關于其他方面,譚律師認為應當注重ADR作為爭議解決方式的新的發展趨勢。在中國商事仲裁未來的發展方向上,他提出應當著力關注國際商事仲裁的多元化特點。將多元化元素注入到國際商事仲裁事務中,為國際商事仲裁的未來發展開辟更廣闊的前景。譚岳奇律師的演講立足于他的實踐和經驗,引起了與會者的多方關注和熱烈反響。
In the field of interim measures, property preservation, and emergency arbitration procedures, by comparing the three, Mr. Tan pointed out that interim measures and emergency arbitration procedures are systems inherent to the common law system. When absorbing and drawing from these, the Chinese arbitration community should pay attention to the unique characteristics of these two systems. Regarding the rules of law application,Mr, Tan noted that the current Chinese arbitration system’s introduction of “applying the law deemed appropriate by the arbitral tribunal when the parties have not agreed on the substantive applicable law” represents an important developmental trend. Attention should be paid here to the potential conflict between the arbitral tribunal’s application of substantive law and China’s Law on the Application of Law in Foreign-related Civil Relations, with particular emphasis on the application of mandatory laws. Concerning the application of foreign law and the expert witness system, he proposed the introduction of neutral expert witnesses. Centered on the concept of the law of the seat of arbitration, he clarified that the core attribute of the law of the seat is “the law that governs and determines the arbitration procedure,” which differs from the law of the place where the arbitration hearings are held. Regarding other aspects, Mr. Tan emphasized the need to focus on the new developmental trends of ADR as a method of dispute resolution. For the future direction of commercial arbitration in China, he suggested that attention should be directed toward the diverse characteristics of international commercial arbitration. Injecting diverse elements into international commercial arbitration affairs will open up broader prospects for its future development. Tan Yueqi(Vincent)’s speech, grounded on his practice and experience, attracted widespread attention and elicited enthusiastic responses from the participants.
律師介紹